The Courage Foundation is excited to join journalists, lawyers, activists and surveillance experts at this year’s Logan CIJ Symposium, 11-12 March at the BCC in Berlin. The 2016 conference is titled Challenge power! Building alliances against Secrecy, Surveillance & Censorship.
Category: Courage News
Courage is proud to join the global coalition launched by Access Now calling on governments across the world not to compromise their citizens’ access to secure communications and end-to-end encryption. Our acting Director Sarah Harrison, Courage advisory members Thomas Drake, Norman Solomon and John Kiriakou have signed individually as well.
The Courage Foundation is excited and grateful to announce that we have been nominated for Index on Censorship’s Freedom of Expression Award, in the Campaigning category, which honours “activists and campaigners who have had a marked impact in fighting censorship and promoting freedom of expression.”
Courage is named alongside dozens of brave and innovative activists and free expression advocates. Also nominated are fellow digital campaigners Electronic Frontier Foundation, artists like Ai Wei Wei, media activists like Journalism is Not a Crime, reporting outlets like Fijileaks, and many more in each category. Browse the lists of other nominees here.
Winners will be celebrated at an awards gala on 13 April 2016 at the Unicorn Theatre in London.
19th October 2015
Ladies and Gentlemen. It is a honour to be here today to accept the Willy Brant Award for Political Courage for my work with WikiLeaks, in getting Edward Snowden asylum, and for my political statements – many of which have called for Germany’s protection of Edward Snowden and my Editor Julian Assange.
I do not do this work alone however – there are of course others that I work with behind the scenes – our researchers, art and design team, journalist and legal teams, and our dedicated technical team. The successes you honour me with today would not be possible alone and I share this award with them.
I apologise that I am speaking to you in English today. After the welcome and protection I have received here in Berlin it is embarrassing that my German is still too wildly poor to give this speech in your great language. But I thank this city, and particularly the many individuals who have personally assisted me in settling here, for your kindness and support. As I do my parents, who join me here today. Without the unwavering support of my family I wouldn’t have been able to build the strength needed to do this work.
Like me Willy Brandt worked as a journalist, unable to go home, for a number of years. Escaping the Nazis Brandt worked as a journalist in exile before finally returning to Germany and entering politics here. Whilst I have no plans to enter politics, I am a journalist at WikiLeaks who, due to legal advice regarding the UK’s misuse of the terrorism act, has been advised not to go home.
My country, the UK, like others around the world at the moment are using the term “national security” incorrectly as fearmongering in an attempt to justify their stripping us of our rights. Despite the proof that it does nothing to the real, or the more prevalent imagined, threat of terrorism the UK, and other states around the world are spying on their own citizens, violating numerous human rights.
– It’s under the guise of national security that the UK started a terrorism investigation in the wake of the Snowden revelations, that puts into question my legal safety and protections as a journalist.
– It’s under the guise of national security that the UK stopped David Miranda as he undertook journalistic work via the UK, denying him his right to silence and journalistic freedoms and protections.
– It is under the guise of national security that the UK introduced law that has permitted them to detain Julian Assange for over five years without charge.
– It’s under the guise of national security the UK government bullied the Guardian newspaper into destroying journalistic material, violating media protections.
– It is under the guise of national security that the UK is planning to scrap the Human Rights Act.
– Its under the guise of national security that the UK, and other states, including Germany, work with a foreign government to spy on their own citizens.
Of course, as the Snowden revelations and WikiLeaks publications, made in collaboration with Der Spiegel and Suddeutsche Zeitung confirm, the surveillance system of the United States is the most abusive and pervasive. They spy not only on their own citizens, but the whole world, including almost every member of the German public, pretty much every member of the SPD, and the German government all the way up to Chancellor Merkel. Specific proof of this intense targetting, including evidence of the spying on Chancellor Merkel, Gerhard Schröder and William Khol, was published just a few months ago by WikiLeaks.
I was heartened when I first arrived in Germany, and not just as I was finally able to eat more than Burger King – I tell you, Bavarian white sausage never looked so good! But, the weekend I arrived Der Spiegel carried the headline “Asylum for Snowden”. I saw, and still see everywhere, stickers, posters and demonstrations with this same call. The first parliamentary inquiry into mass surveillance was begun in the wake of Snowden’s revelations.
However, there is still much lacking. The government including many SPD members of parliament have appeared to do all they can to block the possibility for Snowden to testify safely here, protected in Germany.
I have followed laws being pushed through, voted for almost unanimously by the SPD, that are a direct blow to the work of WikiLeaks and Snowden; an attempt to illegalise WikiLeaks’ work for transparency and democracy through the publication of official secrets, and to legalise the storing of telecommunication-meta-data.
Though the inquiry proceeds it is still surrounded by secrecy. In fact it has predominantly been because of Netzpolitik and WikiLeaks that the German public have had much ability to access documents and many details of this supposedly transparent and democratic oversight process.
Despite WikiLeaks’ more recent NSA publications of US selectors to spy on Germans, the BND is still being allowed by the German government to work more for the NSA than their own people by denying the inquiry committee access to their selector list.
Obama’s overtures to Merkel seem to have worked.
Today, 54 years later, I suggest it is time for the SPD to repeat Brandt’s words from 1961, when he said to President Kennedy, in another serious challenge to democracy: “Berlin expects more than words. It expects political action.”
And I have certainly heard that sentiment echoed around me whilst I have been living here for the last two years.
I have repeatedly seen people’s calls for Julian Assange and Edward Snowden to be given protection to come to Germany safely, testify and claim asylum. Their work to expose mass surveillance and promote transparent and democtratic governments should be rewarded.
Political action to protect Assange.
Political action to protect Snowden.
Political action to protect Germany from US spying.
Yet currently Julian Assange the editor who has fought so hard for many years for our right to know, allowing many around the world to start to get justice, providing us all with greater transparency of governments and corporations by bravely publishing, has been trapped by the UK in one embassy, detained without charge for 5 years, under constant overt and covert surveillance, denied the right to claim his asylum, denied the right to medical treatment, whilst he faces lack of due process and the largest investigation into a publisher ever, abandoned by his country, unsupported by Europe.
Edward Snowden the whistleblower who revealed to us all how we are being spied on by the US and UK is protected only by Russia where he has asylum after assistance by WikiLeaks, from what history shows us, will clearly be an unfair trial by the US government.
These men should be protected and freed. For the country willing to do so, it will mean having to stand up to the US to defend human rights and the rule of law. I ask that that country be Germany. As Brandt said: “Wir wollen mehr Demokratie wagen” – “Let’s dare more democracy”.
I am very pleased that today by awarding me for my work with WikiLeaks for Julian Assange and in getting Edward Snowden asylum, the SPD are showing a good step in once more following the path of Brandt in promoting and standing for our rights, democracy, security and the right to asylum.
Willy Brandt spent a number of years as a political refugee, even forced to change his name for his security.
This award is for those that have been forced into becoming refugees because of their political actions on behalf of us all, and their work for our right to know. And for all those brave whistleblowers and activists that have yet to come forward – but we have seen they will – courage is contagious.
And this is especially for WikiLeaks publisher Julian Assange who, unlike Willy Brandt, has his right to asylum being denied – being blocked by a police siege for the last three years. I hope this award is the first step in more proactive and decisive moves to protect and fight for those truthtellers that are honoured via me today.
Thank you.
Germany’s major centre-left political party SPD has chosen to honour the Courage Foundation’s Acting Director Sarah Harrison with the International Willy Brandt Prize for ‘special political courage’, Der Speigel reports.
The SPD says Harrison “exemplifies the pursuit of transparency and its use against escalating surveillance. Sarah Harrison has with her commitment to WikiLeaks and especially in the company of Edward Snowden showed great political courage.”
The prize is named for former West German chancellor Willy Brandt, who won the 1971 Nobel Peace Prize for reconciling West Germany with Eastern Europe.
Harrison is WikiLeaks’ investigations editor and helped build the Courage Foundation, which was created after Harrison’s best-known effort: protecting NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden as he fled Hong Kong for Moscow in 2013.
Harrison has spent the last several years speaking and writing in support of endangered whistleblowers and against government persecution.
Read Der Spiegel’s full article here.
What happens to the idea of democracy in an age of mass surveillance, data espionage and collaboration between the BND and NSA? How was the NSA scandal received in the United States and Germany and what can – and must – we learn from this?
Courage is proud to co-host a discussion between some of America’s most celebrated intelligence whistleblowers and some of the German politicians charged with investigating the extent of US and German surveillance cooperation. Thomas Drake, Daniel Ellsberg, Jesselyn Radack and Coleen Rowley will be attending the event at Berlin’s Haus der Kulturen der Welt on Sunday 7 June, along with members of the Bundestag surveillance investigation Konstantin von Notz, Martina Renner and former Federal Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information, Peter Schaar. The event will be moderated by Courage Acting Director Sarah Harrison and introduced by Expose Facts’ Norman Solomon.
The event has been organised in association with ExposeFacts.org, DIE ZEIT, ZEIT Online and Transmediale and tickets will be available on the day on a first come, first served basis. The event begins at 3pm.
Missed the event? You can listen to the audio recording online here:
Courage Advisory Board member Thomas Drake is a candidate to be the next Special Rapporteur on the right to privacy for the United Nations. In 2006, Drake blew the whistle on the NSA’s fraudulent and abusive warrantless wiretapping. Courage wishes to congratulate Drake on his candidacy and fully supports his run.
Drake has already taken a stand for privacy in the global sphere. In September 2013, he testified to the European Parliament’s Civil Liberties Committee on the threat that mass surveillance poses to privacy and human rights. In July 2014, he participated in the German Parliament’s formal surveillance inquiry, using his extensive knowledge as a former senior executive with the NSA.
The government persecuted Drake for speaking to the media about wiretapping, charging him with Espionage, bankrupting him with an extensive trial and ruining his career. But since then Drake has been an outspoken voice on civil liberties and privacy in the digital age. In 2011, Drake was awarded the Ridenhour Prize for Truthtelling and was given the Sam Adams Associates for Integrity in Intelligence award. He was featured in the 2014 documentary Silenced, about the US government’s extensive retaliation against whistleblowers.
Rapporteur announcements will be made at the 29th session of the Human Rights Council, held 15 June – 3 July 2015. See other candidates and positions and more information here.
Former CIA director and retired US general David Petraeus has escaped with only a couple of years’ probation and a fine for distributing highly sensitive classified information, revealing “covert operatives, the coalition war strategy and notes about Petraeus’ discussions with President Barack Obama and the National Security Council.”
Meanwhile, Edward Snowden faces multiple Espionage Act charges for releasing information that has given the global public a far better understanding of the US’ mass surveillance apparatus, an act for which he was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize. The US downed planes and cancelled Snowden’s passport in an effort to send him to jail. Why such an enormous disparity?
Those who release information of public interest should be celebrated, not punished. Petraeus’ “sentence” is perhaps the starkest example yet of how the powerful can break the rules they insist on for others, and do so with virtual impunity. In Obama’s war on whistleblowers, punishment is reserved for disclosures that speak truth to power, while the powerful are protected no matter what they do.
Courage trustee Julian Assange, acting director Sarah Harrison, and advisory board members Renata Avila, who is an internet rights lawyer, and Andy Müller-Maguhn, on the board of the Wau Holland Foundation, which collects donations for Snowden and Hammond on Courage’s behalf, participated in a Reddit Ask Me Anything session yesterday.
The AMA followed President Obama’s latest Executive Order, which authorises sanctions against ‘cyber-enabled activities’ and which journalists and supporters worry could affect those donating to WikiLeaks and Courage. In response to the order, issued 1 April 2015, Reddit supporters initiated a surge in bitcoin donations to Edward Snowden’s defence fund.
Overall, supporters have given 3.68 BTC to Courage, with 1.07 coming since the EO, and 1604 to Snowden’s fund. Supporters have given Snowden 24 BTC since the EO alone, through 236 separate donations, with the largest being nearly 8.5 BTC – worth $2000.
Questions covered Courage’s various beneficiaries, its goals and the participants’ outlook for addressing secrecy, the crackdown on whistleblowers and countering propaganda.
Harrison spoke about the ultimate effects of Snowden’s whistleblowing:
The long term effects of Snowden’s actions remain to be seen. What I hope is that the public around the world will stand up for their rights and demand change, and their governments will listen to them. I think a lot rests with users understanding the threats and protecting themselves against them.
I think the rest of Edward’s life will forever be complex, as it will for all that have stood up to the most powerful and speak the truth: Jeremy Hammond, Chelsea Manning, Barrett Brown, Julian Assange and many others. However, he has been granted asylum which offers immediate protection. I hope that in the future more countries stand up to protect him, and all those that have worked for the public’s right to know.
Harrison responded to those who say whistleblowers are “traitors” who “support the enemy”:
This propaganda happens a lot. What is very important here is to explain that throughout the whole of the Manning trial the US government was desperate to prove that some “harm” had come. In fact if could prove none. What did happen, is that the US troops began to withdraw from Iraq. What has happened since Snowden’s revelations is that citizens around the world began to protect their communications. And still not one reported “harm”. In fact we still get bombs by known person’s of suspect. It is a matter of US interests the government is protecting, not US security.
Avila discussed how people in under-developed countries can raise awareness regarding whistleblowers and privacy:
Coming from a similar country, I will say that those are precisely the countries where advocates for the right to truth and access to information in hands of the powerful are crucial. You need to directly connect it as follows: the less the people know about their governments, the more opaque they are, the more they colude with corporations and divert their actions and increase the problems distracting funds to their pockets.
Assange explained why Courage is supporting Matt DeHart:
Matt DeHart has been the subject of significant abuse by the FBI, but the case is very important legally as it involves an interplay between asylum, crypto-extradition, deportation, anonymous, WikiLeaks, espionage and pariah charges. You can read more about Matt’s case here: https://staging.couragefound.org/2015/03/matt-dehart-named-as-third-courage-beneficiary/
Assange and Müller-Maguhn also discussed systemic problems.
You can see all of Harrison’s, Assange’s, Avila’s and Müller-Maguhn’s responses, and you can review the full Reddit AMA here.
Finally, M_Cetera has compiled an easy-to-read collection of all the Courage team members’ responses here.
Support the Courage Foundation and its beneficiaries here:
Bitcoin: 1snowqQP5VmZgU47i5AWwz9fsgHQg94Fa
Bitcoin: 1JeremyESb2k6pQTpGKAfQrCuYcAAcwWqr
Bitcoin: 1DEharT171Hgc8vQs1TJvEotVcHz7QLSQg
Bitcoin: 1courAa6zrLRM43t8p98baSx6inPxhigc