Categories
News

Announcement: Barrett Brown is Courage’s fifth beneficiary

Imprisoned journalist Barrett Brown is Courage’s fifth beneficiary

  • Courage is raising funds for Brown’s commissary, restitution and legal costs
  • Brown continues to write from prison, for D Magazine and soon for The Intercept
  • Currently in solitary confinement, Brown needs continued support and assistance

US journalist and satirist Barrett Brown, author of Flock of Dodos and Keep Rootin’ For Putin, is the Courage Foundation’s fifth beneficiary. Brown is currently serving a 63 month sentence after being persecuted for his work. In 2012, the FBI raided his house, and later that year Barrett was indicted on 12 federal charges relating to the 2011 Stratfor hack. The most controversial charge, linking to the hacked documents, was dropped, but in 2015 Brown was still sentenced to prison.

Courage will collect funds for Brown, who owes more than $890,000 in restitution and who needs money for commissary in prison and for lingering legal costs. Our first campaign is a $5,000 fund drive, which would cover two years of his restitution payments.

Additionally, Courage will update the public on Brown’s condition — he is currently in solitary confinement for an indeterminate length of time but continues to write his column and will soon report for The Intercept.

Brown is the founder of Project PM, a crowd-sourced investigation of the private intelligence industry. In 2011, Project PM released its research of Romas/COIN, “a secretive and immensely sophisticated campaign of mass surveillance and data mining against the Arab world, allowing the intelligence community to monitor the habits, conversations, and activity of millions of individuals at once.”

Courage’s Acting Director Sarah Harrison said,

Barrett Brown’s sentence is a scar on a country that likes to pride itself on a free press. Brown is an excellent journalist who has exposed corrupt and illegal practices. He should be rewarded, not punished. I am pleased to be able to support someone whose work for the public record I admire so much.

Courage Trustee Julian Assange said,

Barrett Brown’s 5 year prison sentence for exposing Bank of America’s corporate espionage campaign against WikiLeaks is the most odious domestic example of Obama’s war on journalism. But far from letting this imprisonment grind him down, every day is making Barrett’s pen sharper. Slowly but surely, and entirely against its will, the Obama administration’s profound injustice is producing America’s greatest living satirist. Anyone who cares about justice and sharp writing is obliged to support Barrett Brown.

Kevin Gallagher, who worked with Barrett on Project PM and who has run his support network for 2 & 1/2 years, said,

While Barrett serves the remainder of his sentence and continues to produce brilliant and hilarious dispatches from his prison cell, I am very grateful to be working with the Courage Foundation on finding new ways to support him. Courage has recognized that Brown’s work on crowd-sourcing the investigation of leaks and his related activism was pioneering and important, and represents the true reason for his imprisonment.

Courage has launched a new website for Barrett, which features his journalism, how to support him, and his ongoing columns from prison, for D Magazine and soon with The Intercept.

Donate to his fund here.

Categories
Edward Snowden News

Daniel Ellsberg and Thomas Drake praise Snowden during Europe truth tour

Whistleblowers and Courage Advisory Board members Thomas Drake and Daniel Ellsberg discussed the recent passage of the USA Freedom Act (following the expiration of the Patriot Act’s Section 215), pointing out problems with the bill while praising Snowden for a “symbolic victory” and for generating the global debate that has led to legal and technological reforms, surveillance inquires and an increasing opposition to mass surveillance.

Drake said, “This is the first time since 9/11 that any publicly known legislation has changed. Mitch McConnell was unable as majority leader to push through what he wanted.” He added, “This vindicates Snowden, even if it’s only symbolic vindication.”

Snowden is “responsible for the Congress refusing to simply rubber stamp the program,” Ellsberg said, while noting that the Act is “in the right direction, but very minimal.”

Both whistleblowers will be in Berlin on Sunday 7 June for a Courage-sponsored discussion on the digital surveillance state, which also features Jesselyn Radack and Coleen Rowley, moderated by Courage’s Sarah Harrison.

Categories
Courage News News

Thomas Drake running for UN Privacy Rapporteur

Courage Advisory Board member Thomas Drake is a candidate to be the next Special Rapporteur on the right to privacy for the United Nations. In 2006, Drake blew the whistle on the NSA’s fraudulent and abusive warrantless wiretapping. Courage wishes to congratulate Drake on his candidacy and fully supports his run.

Drake has already taken a stand for privacy in the global sphere. In September 2013, he testified to the European Parliament’s Civil Liberties Committee on the threat that mass surveillance poses to privacy and human rights. In July 2014, he participated in the German Parliament’s formal surveillance inquiry, using his extensive knowledge as a former senior executive with the NSA.

The government persecuted Drake for speaking to the media about wiretapping, charging him with Espionage, bankrupting him with an extensive trial and ruining his career. But since then Drake has been an outspoken voice on civil liberties and privacy in the digital age. In 2011, Drake was awarded the Ridenhour Prize for Truthtelling and was given the Sam Adams Associates for Integrity in Intelligence award. He was featured in the 2014 documentary Silenced, about the US government’s extensive retaliation against whistleblowers.

Rapporteur announcements will be made at the 29th session of the Human Rights Council, held 15 June – 3 July 2015. See other candidates and positions and more information here.

Categories
Courage News News

Courage statement on Petraeus “sentencing”

Former CIA director and retired US general David Petraeus has escaped with only a couple of years’ probation and a fine for distributing highly sensitive classified information, revealing “covert operatives, the coalition war strategy and notes about Petraeus’ discussions with President Barack Obama and the National Security Council.”

Meanwhile, Edward Snowden faces multiple Espionage Act charges for releasing information that has given the global public a far better understanding of the US’ mass surveillance apparatus, an act for which he was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize. The US downed planes and cancelled Snowden’s passport in an effort to send him to jail. Why such an enormous disparity?

Those who release information of public interest should be celebrated, not punished. Petraeus’ “sentence” is perhaps the starkest example yet of how the powerful can break the rules they insist on for others, and do so with virtual impunity. In Obama’s war on whistleblowers, punishment is reserved for disclosures that speak truth to power, while the powerful are protected no matter what they do.

Categories
Courage News News

Courage team members participate in Reddit AMA

Courage trustee Julian Assange, acting director Sarah Harrison, and advisory board members Renata Avila, who is an internet rights lawyer, and Andy Müller-Maguhn, on the board of the Wau Holland Foundation, which collects donations for Snowden and Hammond on Courage’s behalf, participated in a Reddit Ask Me Anything session yesterday.

The AMA followed President Obama’s latest Executive Order, which authorises sanctions against ‘cyber-enabled activities’ and which journalists and supporters worry could affect those donating to WikiLeaks and Courage. In response to the order, issued 1 April 2015, Reddit supporters initiated a surge in bitcoin donations to Edward Snowden’s defence fund.

Overall, supporters have given 3.68 BTC to Courage, with 1.07 coming since the EO, and 1604 to Snowden’s fund. Supporters have given Snowden 24 BTC since the EO alone, through 236 separate donations, with the largest being nearly 8.5 BTC – worth $2000.

Questions covered Courage’s various beneficiaries, its goals and the participants’ outlook for addressing secrecy, the crackdown on whistleblowers and countering propaganda.

Harrison spoke about the ultimate effects of Snowden’s whistleblowing:

The long term effects of Snowden’s actions remain to be seen. What I hope is that the public around the world will stand up for their rights and demand change, and their governments will listen to them. I think a lot rests with users understanding the threats and protecting themselves against them.

I think the rest of Edward’s life will forever be complex, as it will for all that have stood up to the most powerful and speak the truth: Jeremy Hammond, Chelsea Manning, Barrett Brown, Julian Assange and many others. However, he has been granted asylum which offers immediate protection. I hope that in the future more countries stand up to protect him, and all those that have worked for the public’s right to know.

Harrison responded to those who say whistleblowers are “traitors” who “support the enemy”:

This propaganda happens a lot. What is very important here is to explain that throughout the whole of the Manning trial the US government was desperate to prove that some “harm” had come. In fact if could prove none. What did happen, is that the US troops began to withdraw from Iraq. What has happened since Snowden’s revelations is that citizens around the world began to protect their communications. And still not one reported “harm”. In fact we still get bombs by known person’s of suspect. It is a matter of US interests the government is protecting, not US security.

Avila discussed how people in under-developed countries can raise awareness regarding whistleblowers and privacy:

Coming from a similar country, I will say that those are precisely the countries where advocates for the right to truth and access to information in hands of the powerful are crucial. You need to directly connect it as follows: the less the people know about their governments, the more opaque they are, the more they colude with corporations and divert their actions and increase the problems distracting funds to their pockets.

Assange explained why Courage is supporting Matt DeHart:

Matt DeHart has been the subject of significant abuse by the FBI, but the case is very important legally as it involves an interplay between asylum, crypto-extradition, deportation, anonymous, WikiLeaks, espionage and pariah charges. You can read more about Matt’s case here: https://staging.couragefound.org/2015/03/matt-dehart-named-as-third-courage-beneficiary/

Assange and Müller-Maguhn also discussed systemic problems.

You can see all of Harrison’s, Assange’s, Avila’s and Müller-Maguhn’s responses, and you can review the full Reddit AMA here.

Finally, M_Cetera has compiled an easy-to-read collection of all the Courage team members’ responses here.

Support the Courage Foundation and its beneficiaries here:

Edward Snowden defence fund

Bitcoin: 1snowqQP5VmZgU47i5AWwz9fsgHQg94Fa

Jeremy Hammond defence fund

Bitcoin: 1JeremyESb2k6pQTpGKAfQrCuYcAAcwWqr

Matt DeHart defence fund

Bitcoin: 1DEharT171Hgc8vQs1TJvEotVcHz7QLSQg

Courage Foundation

Bitcoin: 1courAa6zrLRM43t8p98baSx6inPxhigc

Categories
News Whistleblowing

Government rejects Thomas Drake’s retaliation claims

NSA whistleblower and Courage Advisory Board member Thomas Drake had his career and professional reputation ruined after he disclosed information about warrantless wiretapping. Charged under the Espionage Act, Drake narrowly avoided a trial that could’ve landed him in prison for years but was bankrupted defending himself.

Drake formally complained of government retaliation, and as McClatchy reports, his claims were rejected, with the government condoning Drake’s treatment.

Drake told McClatchy, “What happened to me already had a chilling effect on whistleblowers relying on official channel. … This is just more evidence that the system is corrupted.”

Jesselyn Radack, Drake’s attorney with the Government Accountability Project, criticised the government’s handling of his claims: “This report epitomizes the utter lack of protection for national security whistleblowers. …“This is a pathetic, anemic excuse for an investigation.”

Although the Pentagon Inspector General’s Office conceded that his disclosures legally qualified as a whistleblower, it doesn’t believe he was retaliated against —but as McClatchy says, “Drake says the retaliation by the NSA began long before the prosecution and soon after he began cooperating in 2002 with congressional investigations into 9/11 intelligence failures.”

Read McClatchy’s full story here.

Read the report here.

Categories
Matt DeHart News

Thomas Drake’s statement in support of Matt DeHart

Yesterday, Courage named Matt DeHart its third beneficiary, as Matt was deported from Canada back to the United States. Upon his return, Matt appeared before a judge in Buffalo and was ordered to be transferred to Tennessee for arraignment. This is a statement from NSA whistleblower Thomas Drake, a member of the Courage Foundation’s Advisory Board.

It is a fundamental travesty of abject and abusive injustice that Matt DeHart is forcibly returned into the hands of his US torturers by compliant Canadian authorities, for unspecified violations of national security, facing pretextual criminal charges that stem from vague espionage suspicions and allegedly facilitating the disclosure of state secrets to others not authorized to receive them in order to make him an object lesson for those who would dare counter the narrative of the State. I know all too well what happens when one finds themselves in the crosshairs of the US government, is vindictively targeted as an Enemy of the State, has your life data framed, turned inside out, upside down and manipulated for their own ends to protect unaccountable and secret power, facing espionage charges and many decades in prison and as an accomplice and accessory for the ‘crime’ of promoting privacy, anonymity, non-attribution and critically vital disclosures in the public interest including state sponsored torture, war crimes, mass surveillance and secret government wrongdoing. We need to fully support Matt DeHart and his rights to vigorously defend himself as he faces the unmitigated and vengeful wrath of the US injustice system bowing to the punitive pathology of the national security state.

Categories
Courage News Matt DeHart News

Matt DeHart named as third Courage beneficiary

  • 30-year-old former US National Guard drone team member and alleged WikiLeaks courier deported/extradited to US less than 24 hours ago after asylum claim declined by Canada
  • Joins Edward Snowden and Jeremy Hammond as Courage beneficiaries
  • Matt’s parents Leann and Paul DeHart say: “We are comforted knowing we do not stand up against the tide alone.”
  • A few minutes ago Matt DeHart appeared before a judge in Buffalo and was ordered to be transferred to Tennessee for arraignment.

Courage, the international organisation dedicated to the protection of truth-tellers, has announced that its new beneficiary will be Matt DeHart.

Matt DeHart is a 30-year-old former US National Guard drone team member and alleged WikiLeaks courier who worked with the hactivist group Anonymous. In the last 24 hours, he has been deported/extradited from Canada to the United States to face charges that judges in two countries (the US and Canada) have found to lack credibility. WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange said: “Canada’s actions are shameful. It may as well not have a border.” A few minutes ago Matt DeHart appeared before a judge in Buffalo and was ordered to be transferred to Tennessee for arraignment.

For the past five years, Matt DeHart has been at the centre of a US national security investigation and has experienced extraordinary hardship as a result. In 2010, Matt was detained at the US–Canadian border by FBI agents, who administered an IV (intravenous line) to Matt against his will. They questioned him over several days regarding his military unit, his involvement with Anonymous and WikiLeaks. They denied him access to his lawyer, deprived him of sleep, food and water, and tortured him during this time. Although an FBI report confirms Matt was detained for an “espionage matter” and agents asked him nothing about pornography, Matt was presented with a hastily drafted criminal complaint alleging he solicited nude photos from a teenager in 2008.

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange stated: “The abuse of the law in DeHart’s case is obvious, shocking and wrong. Matt DeHart and his family have suffered enough.”

On 3 April 2013, Matt and his family crossed the US–Canadian border again, seeking political asylum and protection under the United Nations Convention on Torture. Canada’s Immigration and Refugee Board turned down the family’s claim in February 2015, even though they found no “credible and trustworthy evidence” to support the charges Matt faces.

Courage has accepted Matt as its third beneficiary in order to raise awareness about his case, prevent him from experiencing further mistreatment in detention and to raise urgently needed funds for his legal defence. DeHart’s legal team have confirmed that they intend to launch legal action against the US government as well as defend Matt from the charges he currently faces.

Sarah Harrison, Courage’s Acting Director, said:

The FBI has ruined Matt’s life to cover up what he knew and to punish his support of WikiLeaks and Anonymous. Objective judges have agreed that the child porn charges are a ruse to smear him in pursuit of national security information.

Tor Ekeland, one of Matt’s lawyers, said:

Knowing the Courage Foundation has Matt’s back is a great relief to everyone fighting for his cause. It’s a privilege to work with such an esteemed organisation so committed to the freedom of information, and to know that there is light in the darkness.

Matt’s parents, Paul and Leann DeHart, said in a statement,

We are humbled and grateful for the support of the Courage Foundation. Facing a crisis of tsunami magnitude, we are comforted knowing we do not stand up against the tide alone.

version2
Matt DeHart, center, with his parents Leann and Paul

In addition to hosting the defence fund, Courage will publicly advocate for Matt DeHart and build his network of support. A re-launched support website at mattdehart.com will provide regular updates on Matt’s case and raise public awareness about the threats he faces.

Donations to the Matt DeHart defence fund can be made at: https://mattdehart.com/donate

Categories
Edward Snowden News

CITIZENFOUR wins Oscar for Best Documentary

The Courage Foundation is delighted that CITIZENFOUR has been awarded the Oscar for the Best Documentary Feature of 2014.

The film shows that after journalists left Edward Snowden in Hong Kong, awaiting the United States’ charges and extradition request, Snowden relied on WikiLeaks to secure him asylum. As Laura Poitras’ film depicts, Snowden is now safe, living comfortably with his girlfriend in Moscow, but the film demonstrates the dangerous gap in protections for whistleblowers. WikiLeaks’ rescue – and the need it demonstrated – was the inception of Courage, devoted to providing protections, defence and safety nets for whistleblowers in the highest-risk situations, when others can’t or won’t help.

Courage, which hosts Edward Snowden’s only official defence fund, is establishing international networks ready to provide future Snowdens with logistical and legal help, in addition to assisting journalistic sources at risk before the investigation stage. But we need your help. Fighting legal battles against the most powerful governments in the world is expensive, yet essential. Courage’s Acting Director Sarah Harrison said: “Governments are ramping up their efforts to persecute those who expose the truth, and we must do the same if we’re going to keep our truth-tellers safe. Donate to Courage to ensure we are there when we are needed most.”

Donate to Courage today to contribute to the frontline of defence for future Snowdens: https://staging.couragefound.org/donate
Further information: https://staging.couragefound.org

Update

Video of Laura Poitras accepting the Oscar for Best Documentary:

The ACLU has published Edward Snowden’s statement congratulating Laura Poitras for her award:

When Laura Poitras asked me if she could film our encounters, I was extremely reluctant. I’m grateful that I allowed her to persuade me. The result is a brave and brilliant film that deserves the honor and recognition it has received. My hope is that this award will encourage more people to see the film and be inspired by its message that ordinary citizens, working together, can change the world.

Categories
Espionage Act News

Stephen Kim explains what it’s like to be charged under the Espionage Act

“I don’t have any power. I am not a human being. I am the property of the state.”

Stephen Kim is a former State Department official, specalising in nuclear weapons and North Korea, who was prosecuted under the Espionage Act for speaking to Fox News reporter James Rosen. Facing years in prison, Kim ultimately accepted a plea deal with a 13-month sentence, and he’s scheduled for release in June 2015.

The Intercept has published a in-depth report by Peter Maas on Kim’s relationship with Rosen, the US government’s aggressive investigation, and the years of pain he endured before succumbing to a deal. Accompanying Maas’ report is Stephen Maing’s short film, The Surrender, which highlights the human cost of the investigation at Kim, something that sits oddly with the sensitivity of information he allegedly passed on to Rosen.

In his report, Maas sheds light on the extensive nature of the evidence the government obtained on Kim:

The FBI was able to acquire Kim’s phone records, Rosen’s phone records, their emails, security badge records for the State Department building, even records of the precise moments Kim accessed the North Korea intelligence report on his office computer. The assemblage of electronic data showed when and where and for how long Kim and Rosen talked, though not what they talked about.

Despite this information trawl, non-circumstantial evidence against Stephen Kim was scant. As Kim’s lawyer wrote in a brief, The government has not produced any email, text message, or recorded conversation documenting the contents of any communication [on June 11] between Mr. Kim and Mr. Rosen. Nevertheless this circumstantial, metadata-based evidence proved to be enough to secure a conviction. The same was true in the case of Jeffrey Sterling, a former CIA official convicted of espionage for discussing a US operation to disrupt Iran’s nuclear programme. The prosecution in Sterling’s case produced evidence of only 2 minutes and 40 seconds worth of phone calls and one innocuous email.

Stephen Kim’s case shows, yet again, the enormous disparity in resources between government and defendant in Espionage Act cases. As Peter Maas writes, “For a defendant facing indictment, the decision to fight is not just moral or legal. It is also largely financial.” For defendants like Kim, indictment under the Espionage Act means not just losing a livelihood, but the likelihood of having to spend their life savings on legal representation.

As Stephen Maing’s short film shows, the weight of his potential sentenced weighed heavily on Kim. For a career civil servant, it clearly brought about a painful reevaluation of basic assumptions. In the Intercept report, Kim likened his
experience to Aaron Swartz’s:

Kim talked for a while about Swartz, and about the particular psychic strain that has to be endured when you feel the government’s fist brought down on you. ‘I know exactly what happened to him,’ Kim said. ‘They threw the kitchen sink at the boy.’ He talked about his own struggle: ‘The only thing I had to think about was how to survive day to day. What do I have to do every single day to be sane.’

Kim felt destroyed:

‘My reputation is gone,’ he said over dinner at a Japanese restaurant in Reston. ‘I don’t have any power. I am not a human being. I am the property of the state.’

Stephen Kim is one of eight leakers that the Obama Administration has prosecuted with the World War I-era spy law, an unprecedented crackdown on whistleblowing, unauthorised leaking, and journalism that’s made government officials afraid to speak to the media.