The Guardian has published claims from unnamed sources that Paul Manafort, former head of Donald Trump’s presidential campaign, had “secret talks” with Julian Assange in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London on three occasions. These claims are completely false and the story has been fabricated.
The Embassy’s visitor logs – maintained by Ecuador – show no such visits, since they did not occur.
This is not the first time that The Guardian, and in particular its writer Luke Harding, have fabricated a story about Assange.
After widespread criticism from journalists across the political spectrum, The Guardian has begun to backpedal its story, adding “sources say” to the headline and editing hedging qualifications throughout the piece.
WikiLeaks is fundraising to file a lawsuit against The Guardian for libel. Contribute here.
Update: 3 December 2018
The Canary reports that former Consul to Ecuador Fidel Narváez “insisted that the claim that former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort met with WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange is entirely false.” The Daily Dot reports as well.
The Guardian concealed third author of Manafort-Assange fabrication: Fernando Villavicencio, the CIA-connected advisor thought to potentially be The Guardian‘s source for the story, is actually listed on the article’s print edition byline.
Reactions
Follow Courage on Twitter for continuous updates and reactions.
Update:
STATEMENT from Manafort: “This story is totally false and deliberately libelous. I have never met Julian Assange or anyone connected to him. I have never been contacted by anyone connected to Wikileaks, either directly or indirectly.” (1/2)
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) November 27, 2018
Original story
Incredible: @TheGuardian is running an entirely bogus story as its front page headline just hours before @rcfp US EDVA hearing on the unsealing of the #AssangeIndictment.
Dan Collyns and Luke Harding have been peddling entirely false Russia propaganda for months.@dcms #FAKENEWS pic.twitter.com/90j1QqgPTa— Hanna Jonasson (@AssangeLegal) November 27, 2018
SCOOP: In letter today to Assange’s lawyers, Guardian’s Luke Harding, winner of Private Eye’s Plagiarist of the Year, falsely claims jailed former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort had secret meetings with Assange in 2013, 2015 and 2016 in story Guardian are “planning to run”. pic.twitter.com/ZEw7Hjwtki
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) November 27, 2018
The authors of the bogus Guardian story, Dan Collyns and Luke Harding, were in Ecuador 10 days ago with US-funded Villavicencio, who they have previously bylined with in bogus stories. This picture was taken last week. pic.twitter.com/hK4SFCJgKI
— Hanna Jonasson (@AssangeLegal) November 27, 2018
latest #Guardian revelations on #PaulManfort? Based on “anonymous sources” + intelligence from Ecuador’s Senain. NOTE: if #PaulManafort actually visited Julian #Assange to discuss very sensitive info/plans,he is a complete idiot: NO way to avoid US-UK surveillance against embassy
— stefania maurizi (@SMaurizi) November 27, 2018
have you noted that each time the press run an article challenging the main narrative on Julian #Assange, an article trying to destroy his reputation follows shortly?
— stefania maurizi (@SMaurizi) November 27, 2018
Remember when The Guardian falsely said that Assange had hacked the embassy systems, and then modified their article post-publication after WikiLeaks threatened to sue? That was Collyns, Harding and Villavicencio.https://t.co/1G2t2hvzfq pic.twitter.com/zFSlNpk1rP
— Hanna Jonasson (@AssangeLegal) November 27, 2018
Villavicencio has fabricated claims about people visiting Assange in the past. In May he claimed Farage visited Assange on 28 April this year, a month after Ecuador initiated its 8 month-long isolation of Assange, banning phone calls, all visits, internet.https://t.co/ZdzeTsCUtL pic.twitter.com/oD9TdPyE5p
— Hanna Jonasson (@AssangeLegal) November 27, 2018
Also, embassy employees who were there during that entire time period say they never saw Manafort or heard of his visit. Senain is out for JA because he published their internal documents. They seek an excuse to get him out of the Embassy. Seems the Guardian is playing along.
— Eva Golinger (@evagolinger) November 27, 2018
Assange Never Met Manafort. Luke Harding and the Guardian Publish Still More Blatant MI6 Lies – The right wing Ecuadorean government of President Moreno continues to churn out its production line of fake documents regarding Julian Assange, and channel https://t.co/4H2v0XwZOD
— Craig Murray (@CraigMurrayOrg) November 27, 2018
I have worked as a media partner of #WikiLeaks since 2009, I have NEVER EVER heard that a visitor has been admitted to the @EmbajadaEcuUK without his/her name, passport being registered: it has alwas been a strict procedure
— stefania maurizi (@SMaurizi) November 27, 2018
Villavicencio made the ludicrous claim in July that Manafort could be Wikileaks source of the DNC material.
In the same story, Villavicencio tried to implicate former diplomat Fidel Narvaez in a plot.
Collyns and Harding’s have a habit of recycling Villavicencio fabrications. pic.twitter.com/Wg77m6gRbO— Hanna Jonasson (@AssangeLegal) November 27, 2018
Folks the skepticism to that Guardian report couldn’t be more broad-based:@ggreenwald @aaronjmate @auerfeld @pwnallthethings @benjaminwittes @NatSecGeek and me rarely ALL agree. But we do all think that this is sketchy.
— emptywheel (@emptywheel) November 27, 2018
Guardian hack Luke Harding was caught plagiarizing me, @yashalevine & others—and it had zero effect on his career advancement. If his latest “scoop” on Manafort/Assange is debunked, there will be zero consequences. Most of us still can’t fully grasp this https://t.co/8AeD8GRXh0
— Mark Ames (@MarkAmesExiled) November 27, 2018
Wow, look at Guardian rapidly back-pedalling on Assange/Manafort claims. Expect more changes…https://t.co/l8owqUdUGw
— Media Lens (@medialens) November 27, 2018
I offer some caution about that Guardian report everyone is talking about: https://t.co/lu40ql2VWj
— Jeet Heer (@HeerJeet) November 27, 2018
Reasons for skepticism:
1) the sources are vague
2) Assange under heavy surveillance, so a Manafort visit would be easy to prove
3) WL denies it (https://t.co/wWPaLKczcf); Manafort calls it “100% false”
4) my 2017 interview w/ the author of this piece: (https://t.co/P52sVRaDsA) https://t.co/RROdsA5EUc— Aaron Maté (@aaronjmate) November 27, 2018
more reasons: 4) the timing: US prosecutors are fighting a bid to unseal Assange’s indictment & Ecuador has denied Assange lawyers access to him (https://t.co/LPyHlDvUmX)
5) along w/ Manafort, there were even “Russians”: 🤔 pic.twitter.com/vuXBK8WaV7
— Aaron Maté (@aaronjmate) November 27, 2018
Guardian quietly edits itself away from completely fabricated blockbuster “Manafort visited Assange at embassy” story. Expect more changes. Will editor @KathViner resign? https://t.co/JgEXSTXFzg pic.twitter.com/93mdLRtncb
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) November 27, 2018
Julian Assange’s attorney @suigenerisjen tells @CNN Assange did not meet with Paul Manafort as detailed in the Guardian story. “No such meetings took place,” she said. Adding they have had “no contact with the Mueller investigation.”
— Kara Scannell (@KaraScannell) November 27, 2018
WikiLeaks launches legal fund to sue the Guardian for publishing entirely fabricated story “Manafort held secret talks with Assange in Ecuadorian embassy” — which spread all over the world today. It is time the Guardian paid a price for fabricating news. https://t.co/VaoMESN5RO
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) November 27, 2018